Comments on: 9.5.0.10 New Release

By: Karl

Karl — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:40:18 +0000

Nothing yet, send me an email and I’ll create one.

By: stewie

stewie — Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:15:33 +0000

do you guys have a recommendation section, i’d like to suggest some stuff

By: junkone

junkone — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:21:45 +0000

the chm link is not working. appreciate if you can look into it

By: Ken Gilb

Ken Gilb — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:01:51 +0000

When connected to TWS using the edemo account I’m getting a new message type in the ProcessMessage and it’s throwing an InvalidCast exception. TWS is returning ApiPending as an OrderStatus. I’ve added it to the OrderStatus enum and recompiled and it seems to have fixed the problem. You may wish to update your API. Thanks for the great work.

By: Webby

Webby — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:14:47 +0000

This is such a wonderful tool.

Thanks do much for all you efforts in creating this is C#. It will be very helpful going forwards for developers interfacing with IB.

By: Noam

Noam — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:16:54 +0000

Thanks for this great api.
One small question – how can i send a request for FUNDAMENTAL_RATIOS. I can’t seem to find a dedicated request only the tick type used for the answer. Is it missing a GenericTickType or a function?

By: Leo

Leo — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:21:18 +0000

Thanks for the wonderful works!

I read the source codes and thought it has a wrapper of the unmanaged code at beginning. may c#/C be a better option? I don’t know. But it looks to me is better in the Software engineering view. But current one is a teriffic too. Save my life to re-invent the wheel.:P

By: James

James — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:01:16 +0000

Hi, I found your blog on this new directory of WordPress Blogs at blackhatbootcamp.com/listofwordpressblogs. I dont know how your blog came up, must have been a typo, i duno. Anyways, I just clicked it and here I am. Your blog looks good. Have a nice day. James.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:54:10 +0000

sorry – correction on my last post.

I was wondering why a SOCKET based implementation

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:53:18 +0000

Hello. I was wondering why a thread based implementation is considering superior to just using the IB ActiveX Control? Does using ActiveX affect the ability to write threaded programs?

Thank you.

Andy

By: Karl

Karl — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:22:07 +0000

Hello Gumphrie,

No reason that I know of. I have not used this order type, so I had not tested it. Give it a try, buy make sure you set the correct abbreviation in the description field. If it works, submit me a patch and I will update it,

-Karl

By: Gumphrie

Gumphrie — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:28:49 +0000

Hi There Karl,

Thankyou for such a useful library!

Not sure if this a general API question.
Is there some reason why I can’t find MarketToLimit (MTL) orders in the OrderTypes enum?
Could I just add it to the list in OrderTypes?

Thanks in Advance